This is what I was using until a few months ago, and it works well. It’s not an option for me to leave this data sitting unencrypted on some machine over which I have no control. And, because of my particular job, all day long I deal with nothing but highly-confidential and highly-sensitive information. Probably more than 99% of users out there, actually. While I probably still prefer The Hit List overall, I’m not confident in its future development, and Things really is too simplistic for what I need these days. (If you spend any time on these apps’ support sites, you’ll see that all of them say they may offer this sort of thing in the future, but it’s most certainly not a priority.)Ī while ago I settled, finally, on OmniFocus, despite its Mac app being kind of a visual abomination. I find this kind of unbelievable, and frankly, a bit odd, as I think most users of these services would be willing to sacrifice a little speed for a lot of security. Sure, the communications between your devices and their sync server may be secure, but the data itself isn’t. While each of the “big three” task-management apps for the Mac now provides a native OTA sync service, none of these services encrypts your data at the point of storage. Over the last couple of years I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about task-management applications (I’m notorious for having bounced around frequently between OmniFocus, Things, and The Hit List), and the ways in which their data is synced across instances of their apps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |